Engineers working to restore 400,000 wiped police records, Priti Patel says

Politics

More than 400,000 police records have accidentally been deleted from a national database, prompting warnings that criminal investigations could be compromised, Sky News understands.

The fingerprint, DNA and arrest history records were wiped due to “human error” and “defective code”, policing minister Kit Malthouse said yesterday.

It was initially reported by The Times that 150,000 records were lost, but it is now understood the figure is much higher.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘The scale of this looks to be increasing’

Some 213,000 offence records were wiped from the Police National Computer, along with 175,000 arrest records and 15,000 person records.

It is believed some of these records overlap and apply to the same crime or individual.

A total of 26,000 DNA records relating to 21,710 people have also potentially been deleted, as well as 30,000 fingerprint records and 600 subject records.

These figures are understood to be a “best estimate” as authorities are still trying to establish the full scale of the data wipe.

More from Police

One senior officer told Sky News that investigations could be compromised as information would be unable to be cross-referenced because of the deleted data.

The issue occurred during routine maintenance of the Police National Computer this week.

Kit Malthouse
Image:
Kit Malthouse says the wipe was due to ‘human error’

The policing minister explained: “Unfortunately down to human error, some defective code was introduced as part of that routine maintenance earlier this week and that’s resulted in a deletion of some records and that’s currently under investigation.”

In a later statement, Mr Malthouse said the issue had been identified and corrected “so it cannot happen again”.

He confirmed officials are now “working at pace to recover the data”, adding: “While the loss related to individuals who were arrested and then released with no further action, I have asked officials and the police to confirm their initial assessment that there is no threat to public safety.”

Earlier, the Home Office said “no records of criminal or dangerous persons have been deleted” and “no further records can be deleted”.

But police sources confirmed that a letter sent by the National Police Chiefs’ Council yesterday said some of the deleted records were marked “for indefinite retention following conviction of serious offences”.

Sources also say that references in the letter to “near misses” where biometric matches have not been triggered in an investigation could be “optimistically written” and the consequences of the data loss could be wide.

London’s victims’ commissioner, Claire Waxman, said she does not believe public safety will be unaffected by the error.

“In stalking & DA cases, we can see many arrests & no action until pattern of behaviour is identified,” she wrote on Twitter.

Home Secretary Priti Patel
Image:
Home Secretary Priti Patel has been urged to explain the data loss

Speaking to Sky News, Labour’s shadow home secretary Nick Thomas-Symonds said: “You do not make our streets safer by losing such a substantial amount of information about criminal behaviour. This is extraordinarily serious.

“The home secretary needs to be gripping this and tell us what’s going to be done to mitigate the risk, to try and recover this data and how do we prevent it from happening again.”

Mr Thomas-Symonds has written to Home Secretary Priti Patel urging her to explain what led to the large data loss.

But government sources said the shadow home secretary had turned down a briefing with Mr Malthouse on Friday, so home affairs committee chair Yvette Cooper was briefed instead.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Trump And House GOP’s Promise To Not Cut Social Security Is Total Nonsense
Salesforce will hire 2,000 people to sell AI products, CEO Benioff says
CFPB sues JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo over Zelle fraud
New proposal for LA County juvenile hall – NBC Los Angeles
Boot Battle: The Legendary Danner vs Merrell Hiking Boots